Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumour complicated by intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a young male: a case report and systematic review of the literature
Case Report

Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumour complicated by intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a young male: a case report and systematic review of the literature

Mark H. X. Yeo1 ORCID logo, Shawn J. S. Seah1, Wen Qiang Lee1, Krishan Kumar Sharma2, Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan3, Lei Jiang1

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; 2Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; 3Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: MHX Yeo, WQ Lee, L Jiang; (II) Administrative support: MHX Yeo, L Jiang; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: L Jiang; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: MHX Yeo, SJS Seah, L Jiang; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: MHX Yeo, SJS Seah, L Jiang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Lei Jiang, MBBS, MRCS, MMed (Orthopaedic Surgery), MPhil, FRCS. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 1 Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore. Email: jiang.lei@singhealth.com.sg.

Background: Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CE-NETs) are rare intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumours that are hard to differentiate from other IDEM tumours such as schwannomas and ependymomas on imaging. While literature surrounding CE-NET and other IDEM tumours continues to grow, evidence on complications such as intra-tumoural hemorrhage remains rare, with few cases reported in the literature.

Case Description: We report a rare case of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a 35-year-old Caucasian male with newly-diagnosed CE-NET. The patient presented with acute lower back pain with L1 radiculopathy complicated by acute retention of urine. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected an IDEM mass lesion adjacent to the conus medullaris at the T12–L1 level with heterogenous enhancement. The patient underwent T12/L1 laminectomy and excision of lesion, with histology and immunohistochemical evaluation supporting the diagnosis of a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour. The patient made a complete recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 5. A systematic review was conducted for similar cases of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in IDEM tumours, with 36 cases of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in IDEM tumours reported to date.

Conclusions: Intra-tumoural hemorrhage in IDEM tumours is rare, especially in a CE-NET tumour. While symptoms can be debilitating and range from severe back pain to significant neurologic deficit, early identification via radiological and histological evaluation as well as early surgical resection leads to good prognosis.

Keywords: Case report; intradural extramedullary (IDEM); neuroendocrine; hemorrhage; tumour


Submitted Jul 17, 2025. Accepted for publication Oct 17, 2025. Published online Jan 14, 2026.

doi: 10.21037/jss-25-128


Highlight box

Key findings

• Intra-tumoural hemorrhage in intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumours is rare, especially in cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CE-NETs).

• While presentation is often delayed due to their indolent nature, it may become clinically apparent through symptoms of severe, acute lower back pain with neurologic deficits.

• Radiologic features are not well-established and histology is often required to distinguish CE-NETs from other tumour types.

• Surgical resection remains the gold standard management with good outcomes.

What is known and what is new?

• While literature surrounding CE-NET and other IDEM tumours continues to grow, evidence on complications such as intra-tumoural hemorrhage remains rare, with few cases reported in the literature.

• This case report and systematic review provides further evidence on the presentation, investigation and management of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a patient with CE-NET.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• In a patient suspected to have IDEM and presenting with acute severe lower back pain, intra-tumoural hemorrhage should be considered.

• It is crucial to look out for key features suggestive of intra-tumoural hemorrhage on imaging.

• Early surgical resection is indicated and leads to good prognosis.


Introduction

Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumours (CE-NETs) are rare benign lesions accounting for reportedly 3–4% of intradural spinal tumours (1,2). They were previously termed paragangliomas (PGLs), but most recently they have instead been classified as “paraganglioma-like neuroendocrine neoplasms” in the World Health Organization (WHO) tumour classification due to molecular and histopathological differences compared with paragangliomas originating outside the central nervous system (CNS) (1,2). CE-NETs are derived from specialized neural crest cells in the cauda equina/filum terminale region (3). Unlike extra-CNS PGLs, CE-NETs usually arise sporadically rather than inherited and the rate of recurrence following resection is lower (1). Pre-operatively, the diagnosis of CE-NETs is difficult as it resembles other intradural tumours such as ependymomas and neurinomas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (2).

Intra-tumoural hemorrhage in intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumours is extremely rare, with majority of reported cases in the literature found in spinal schwannomas (4-7). Thus, we share our experience with a rare care of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a CE-NET causing impending conus medullaris syndrome. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of existing case reports to highlight the prevalent tumour types, clinical presentation, imaging findings and postoperative course for IDEM tumours with intra-tumoural hemorrhage. We present this article in accordance with the CARE and PRISMA reporting checklists (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/rc).


Case presentation

A 35-year-old Caucasian male with no previous medical history presented with a 1-day duration of acutely worsening, severe lower back pain with radicular symptoms in the L1 dermatome. The pain was precipitated by weightlifting and on presentation the patient was unable to lie supine due to pain. This was complicated by acute retention of urine, although digital rectal exam revealed an intact anal tone and neurological exam was unremarkable. Prior to this episode, the patient had a 2-year history of insidious lower back pain, of which no appropriate imaging was available and symptoms were managed well conservatively. The patient denied any trauma prior to admission. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.

Radiographs of the lumbar spine showed mildly narrowed intervertebral disc space at L5–S1 but was otherwise normal. MRI of the lumbar spine revealed an IDEM mass lesion adjacent to the conus medullaris at the T12–L1 level. The lesion was hypointense on T2-weighted (T2w) sequence and isointense to mildly hyperintense (minimal enhancement) on T1-weighted (T1w) sequence (see Figure 1). It was compressing on the cauda equina and causing severe spinal canal as well as lateral recess stenosis, although the conus medullaris maintained normal signal intensity. Gradient-echo sequences demonstrated sequelae features of prior intra-tumoural hemorrhage, with the presence of small amount of fluid-fluid level at S1–S2 level representing likely intradural blood products.

Figure 1 MRI images of the lumbar spine showing T12–L1 lesion with sequence as follows: (A) sagittal T2w sequence (with visible fluid levels representing remnant blood products at S1–2 level); (B) sagittal T2w TIRM; (C) sagittal T1w sequence; (D) transverse T2w sequence; (E) transverse T2w MEDIC sequence; (F) transverse T1w sequence. I, inferior; MEDIC, multiple echo data image combination; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; R, right; T1w, T1-weighted; T2w, T2-weighted; TIRM, turbo inversion recovery magnitude.

The patient underwent a T12/L1 laminectomy and excision of lesion (see Figure 2 for intraoperative imaging). Durotomy was performed at the midline. Intra-operatively, the lesion was mobilised from the dura, and resection of a single efferent and afferent nerve was performed. Grossly, the tumour appeared to be a dark brownish circumscribed nodule, with features of hemorrhage (see Figure 3). Neuromonitoring demonstrated diminished somato-sensory evoked potential (SSEP) from L3–S1 pre-operatively which improved significantly postoperatively. Histopathological examination of the tumour showed sheets of round, mononuclear cells in vascularized stroma with well-differentiated features. Keratin positivity and non-specific staining supported the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumour over paraganglioma (see Figure 4). There was the presence of marked intra-tumoural hemorrhage which interfered with morphological assessment. Biopsy of adjacent bone tissue was negative for malignancy. Postoperatively, the patient’s lower back pain demonstrated considerable improvement and the patient’s pain was well-controlled with oral analgesia by postoperative day 4. Neurological exam was unremarkable, although patient demonstrated mild left scrotal neuropathic pain, possibly secondary to dissection of the nerve root. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5.

Figure 2 Intraoperative imaging showing identification of laminectomy levels. L, left.
Figure 3 Image showing gross specimen of tumour with features of hemorrhage.
Figure 4 Image of tumour pathology slides showing (A) sheets of round mononuclear cells in vascularised stroma under high-powered microscopy (hematoxylin and eosin staining; magnification, ×400) as well as the following immunohistochemistry profile: (B) negative under S100 stain (marker for Schwann cells and sustentacular cells; IHC staining; magnification, ×400); (C) positive under MNF116 stain (cytokeratin marker; IHC staining; magnification, ×400); (D) positive for synaptophysin stain (neuroendocrine marker; IHC staining; magnification, ×400). IHC, immunohistochemistry.

Systematic review

A search of three different databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus) up to September 2025 was conducted using terms related to ‘intradural extramedullary tumours’ and ‘hemorrhage’, summarized in our search strategy (Appendix 1). Additional articles were identified via citation searching. Two independent authors (M.H.X.Y. and S.J.S.S) filtered case reports based on title and abstract followed by full-text screen. Inclusion criteria included case reports presenting intra-tumoural hemorrhage in IDEM tumours. Exclusion criteria were: (I) age <18 years; (II) non-English study; (III) hemorrhage not intra-tumoural (e.g., subarachnoid, subdural or intramedullary); (IV) hemorrhage of iatrogenic etiology (e.g., anaesthesia complication). The following data were extracted: age/sex, tumour histology, etiology, onset, clinical presentation, MRI features, timing of surgery (defined as duration from onset of symptoms), surgical details (level and completeness of resection), length of stay, latest follow-up duration and postoperative recovery. As this was a systematic review, combined data was synthesized and reported as mean or percentage using simple arithmetic formula, and qualitatively analysed. Meta-analysis was not conducted. All included studies were case reports on rare conditions, hence risk-of-bias assessment was not required.


Discussion

This case report highlights a rare case of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a spinal neuroendocrine tumour, or CE-NET tumour, previously classified as PGL tumours. In our systematic review, a total of 36 cases of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in spinal IDEM tumours were identified across 34 publications, of which 23 were published more than 10 years ago (6,8-19), while the rest were published within the last 10 years (4,5,7,20-37). All case report characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 51.5 years old (range, 28–81 years), with a slight male predominance (58.3% male). The study selection process is summarized in the PRISMA Flowchart (Figure 5).

Table 1

Summary of primary intradural extramedullary spinal tumors with intra-tumoral hemorrhage

Author, year (ref.) Age (years)/sex Tumour histology Tumour level Etiology Onset Clinical presentation MRI features Timing of surgery* Surgery level; completeness of resection LOS Latest
FU
Motor recovery, bladder/sphincter recovery, pain resolution
Uemura et al., 1998 (8) 58/F Schwannoma T12 Spontaneous Acute-on-chronic Paraparesis, radicular pain T1w iso-to-hyperintense, T2w hyperintense Urgent T11–L2 laminectomy; complete NR NR NR
Cohen et al., 2000 (9) 52/M Schwannoma T11–L2 Trauma (fall) Acute Paraplegia, BD, SD, back pain T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense Urgent T10–L2 laminectomy; complete NR 12 mo Motor: partial (ambulate with aid)
Bladder: partial
Sphincter: complete
Ng et al., 2001 (10) 43/M Schwannoma C6–7 Spontaneous Acute Hemiparesis, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense Urgent C5–7 laminectomy; complete NR 3 mo Motor: complete
Bladder: complete
Tait et al., 2004 (11) 57/M Ependymoma L1–S2 Anticoagulation Acute Left LL weakness, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain T1w hypointense, T2w hypointense Urgent L2–S1 laminectomy; complete NR 12 mo Motor: complete (ambulate without aid)
Bladder: partial
Heuer et al., 2007 #1: 31/F Both: ependymoma #1: L1–S2 #1: spontaneous Both: acute #1: Right LL weakness; BD, back pain Both: T1w heterogenous, T2w heterogenous #1: 1 mo delay #1: L1–3 laminectomy; complete NR Both:
4 wks
Both: motor: complete (ambulate without aid); bladder/sphincter: complete
(2 cases) (12) #2: 31/M #2: T11–L2 #2: strenuous activity #2: Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain #2: 5 days delay #2: T11–L2 laminectomy, complete
Ozdemir et al., 2007 (13) 62/M Ependymoma L1 Trauma (RTA) Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, SD T1w isointense, T2w heterogenous Urgent NR; complete 3 wks NR Motor: complete
Sphincter: complete
Ichinose et al., 2009 (14) 64/M Schwannoma T12–L1 Anticoagulation Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous 4 wks delay T11–L2 laminectomy; complete NR 8 wks Motor: partial (ambulate with aid)
Bladder/sphincter: complete
Pain: resolved
Martinez-Perez et al., 2012 (15) 32/M Ependymoma 2 synchronous lesions: T9, L2–3 Spontaneous Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, back pain Lesion 1: T1w isointense, T2w hypointense Urgent L1–2 and T8–11 laminectomy; complete 10 days 2 mo Motor: complete (ambulate unassisted)
Lesion 2: T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense Bladder: complete
Dobson et al., 2013 (16) 81/F Metastasis (RCC) L2 Spontaneous Acute Left LL weakness, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense 2 wks delay L2 laminectomy and L1/3 hemilaminectomy; complete NR 3 mo Motor: complete (ambulate independently)
Sahoo et al., 2015 (18) 44/M Schwannoma C3–5 Spontaneous Acute Quadriparesis, paraesthesia, radicular pain T1w heterogenous, T2w iso-to-hyperintense Urgent C3–4 laminectomy; complete NR NR Motor: complete
Pain: resolved
Woo et al., 2014 (17) 60/M Paraganglioma T12–L2 Spontaneous Acute-on-chronic Paraplegia, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain T1w heterogenous, T2w heterogenous Urgent T12–L2 laminectomy; complete NR 6 mo Motor: complete (ambulate without aid)
Bladder: complete
Sphincter: complete
Jenkins et al., 2015 (6) 62/M Schwannoma L2–3 Spontaneous Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, back pain T1w heterogenous, T2w heterogenous Urgent L2–3 laminectomy; complete NR 11 y Motor: complete (jogging)
Pain: resolved
Wu et al., 2015 (19) 57/M Metastasis (HCC) T12–S1 Spontaneous Acute-on-chronic Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain T1w hypointense, T2w hypointense Urgent L1–4 laminectomy; Incomplete NR NR Motor: none
BD: none
Pain: resolved
Nagarjun et al., 2016 (22) 36/F Paraganglioma T12–L2 Spontaneous Acute Paraplegia, paraesthesia, BD T1w isointense, T2w hyperintense Urgent T12–L2 laminectomy NR 9 mo Motor: partial
Bladder: partial
Morimoto et al., 2016 (21) 28/M Ependymoma L1–2 Trauma (fall) Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, back pain T1w isointense, T2w heterogenous Urgent T12–L3 laminectomy; complete NR 4 y Motor: partial (ambulating with aid)
Bladder: complete
Pain: resolved
Hdeib et al., 2016 (20) 71/M Schwannoma T8 Anticoagulation Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, back pain T1w hyperintense, T2w hypointense Urgent NR; complete NR 6 mo Motor: partial (ambulate with walker)
Trauma (spinal manipulation)
Prasad et al., 2016 (23) 40/M Schwannoma C7–T3 Trauma (fall) Acute Paraplegia, paraesthesia T1w isointense, T2w hyperintense Urgent C7–T3 laminectomy; complete NR 6 mo Motor: partial (ambulate with support)
Panero et al., 2017 (24) 58/M Capillary hemangioma T10–11 Trauma (did not specify) Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, SD T1w iso-to-hyperintense, T2w isointense-to-hyperintense 15 days delay T10–11 laminotomy; complete NR 18 mo Motor: partial (ambulate with aid)
Kimura et al., 2018 (2 cases) (26) #1: 64/F Both: schwannoma #1: T12–L1 Both: traumatic (fall) Both: acute Both: back pain (no weakness/numbness) #1: T1w isointense, T2w hypointense #1: 1 wk delay #1: T12–L1 laminectomy; complete NR #1: 3 y Both: pain: resolved
#2: 61/F #2: L2–3 #2: T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous #2: 6 y delay #2: L2 laminectomy; complete #2: 6 y
Gandhoke et al., 2018 (25) 38/M Schwannoma C2–4 Spontaneous Acute-on-chronic Quadriparesis, neck pain T1w hypointense, T2w heterogenous Urgent C2–4 laminectomy; complete 5 days NR Motor: complete
Ghedira et al., 2019 (27) 64/M Paraganglioma L2–3 Spontaneous Acute Paraplegia, radicular pain T1w heterogenous, T2w hypointense Urgent L2–3 laminectomy; complete NR NR Motor: complete
Pain: resolved
Rahyussalim et al., 2019 (29) 38/F Schwannoma T10–L2 Trauma (spinal manipulation) Acute-on-chronic Paraplegia, paraesthesia, BD, SD T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense 2 mo delay T10–T12 laminectomy; complete NR 6 mo Motor: partial (ambulate with aid)
Bladder: none
Kim et al., 2019 (28) 68/F Meningioma T6–7 Spontaneous Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous Urgent T6–7 laminectomy; complete 3 days 6 mo Motor: complete
BD: complete
Pain: resolved
Gotecha et al., 2019 (4) 61/F Schwannoma L3–5 Trauma (fall) Chronic Paraesthesia, radicular pain T1w isointense, T2w hyperintense, fluid-fluid level NR L3–5 laminectomy; complete 2 wks 2 wks Pain: resolved
Jung et al., 2019 (7) 37/M Schwannoma C2–3 Strenuous activity Acute Quadriparesis, paraesthesia T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous Urgent C2–3 right hemilaminectomy; complete NR 3 wks Motor: complete (ambulate without support)
Ito et al., 2019 (5) 58/F Schwannoma L4–S1 Spontaneous Acute Left LL weakness, paraesthesia,
radicular pain
T1w iso-to-hyperintense, T2w heterogenous, fluid-fluid level 1 mo delay L5 laminectomy; complete NR NR Motor: complete
Pain: resolved
Singh et al., 2020 (30) 35/F Schwannoma C2–T2 Spontaneous Acute Quadriparesis, BD, respiratory distress T1w hypointense, T2w heterogenous 1 week delay C3–T3 laminoplasty; complete NR 3 mo Motor: partial (ambulate with support)
Others: respiratory distress resolved
Imabeppu et al., 2021 (31) 51/M Schwannoma L5–S1 Coagulopathy Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous Urgent NR; NR NR 4 days Motor: complete
Bladder: complete
Mahajan et al., 2021 (32) 53/M Schwannoma C6–7 Spontaneous Chronic Radicular pain NR 9 mo delay C5–7 laminectomy; complete NR 2 y Pain: resolved
Mastantuoni et al., 2022 (33) 55/F Arachnoid cyst C7–T2 Spontaneous Acute Paraparesis, paraesthesia, SD T1w and T2w iso-to-hyperintense, fluid-fluid level 3 wks delay C7–T1 laminectomy; complete NR 3 mo Motor: partial
Sphincter: complete
Choi et al., 2023 (34) 43/F Ependymoma T12–L1 Spontaneous Chronic Radicular pain T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense NR T12–L1 left hemilaminectomy; complete NR NR NR
Salama et al., 2024 (35) 58/M Ewing sarcoma L3–S1 Spontaneous Acute-on-chronic Paraparesis, paraesthesia, back pain T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous Urgent L3–5 laminotomy; complete NR NR Motor: partial
Shen et al., 2024 (36) 53/F Schwannoma T12 Spontaneous Acute-on-chronic Paraesthesia, back pain NR Urgent T11–L1 laminectomy; complete NR 3 mo Pain: resolved
Zico et al., 2025 (37) 50/F Schwannoma L1–2 Spontaneous Acute-on-chronic Left LL weakness, SD, radicular pain T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous, fluid-fluid levels NR L1–2 laminectomy; complete NR NR NR

*, duration between onset of symptoms and surgery, where urgent surgery occurs within 48 hours. BD, bladder dysfunction; F, female; F/U, follow-up; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LL, lower limb; LOS, length of stay; M, male; mo, months; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NR, not reported; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RTA, road traffic accident; SD, sphincter dysfunction; T1w, T1-weighted; T2w, T2-weighted; UL, upper limb; wks, weeks; y, years.

Figure 5 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flowchart.

In the literature, schwannomas accounted for the majority of IDEM tumours with intra-tumoural hemorrhage (20 cases, 55.6%) (4-10,14,18,20,23,25,26,29-32,36,37), followed by ependymomas (7 cases, 19.4%) (11-13,15,21,34) and paragangliomas (3 cases, 8.3%) (17,22,27). One case was reported for each of the following: meningioma, arachnoid cyst, capillary hemangioma and Ewing sarcoma (24,28,33,35). Lastly, 2 cases of metastases were reported (renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma primaries, respectively) (16,19). Lesions were most frequently located in the thoracolumbar region. Notably, the thoracolumbar junction (T11–L2) accounted for nearly one-third of all cases, making it the single most common site of hemorrhagic IDEM tumours (8,9,12,14,17,19,26,34,36). Similarly, in our patient’s case, the tumour originated from T12-L1 region. CE-NET tumours typically arise from cauda equina nerve roots or filum terminale, with some studies reporting higher incidence in the latter (22). Typical histological features of CE-NET tumours consist of cells with round/oval nuclei and rare mitoses, while key immunohistochemical markers include chromogranin A, synaptophysin or cytokeratin positivity (38). Some studies have used the ‘vascular theory’ to explain the pathophysiology of intra-tumoural hemorrhage, which results from ectatic intra-tumoural vessels undergoing spontaneous thrombosis, leading to tumour necrosis and hemorrhage (39).

In terms of radiological assessment, MRI is the gold standard for diagnosis of CE-NET tumours. Koeller et al. reported that PGL tumours are typically well-circumscribed masses isointense relative to the spinal cord on T1w sequence and isointense to hyperintense on T2w sequence, although this is not well-established (40). In the event of hemorrhage, a low-signal-intensity rim is usually seen on T2w sequence (40). For our patient, the tumour was largely hypointense on T2w sequence, which could have been contributed by the intra-tumoural hemorrhage. Interestingly, pre-operatively, the tumour was radiologically diagnosed as an IDEM and we were unable to identify the exact tumour type, which is an issue that remains common in the literature given the uncertainty in its radiologic characteristics (2,41). In our systematic review, the MRI findings remained largely varied, with T1w and T2w sequences for different cases ranging from hypo- to hyperintense, while some had heterogenous enhancement, with no classic finding for each tumour type. Thus, it may be difficult to distinguish between tumour types purely from radiological imaging.

In terms of etiology, majority of the intra-tumoural hemorrhage was spontaneous (21 cases, 58.3%) (5,6,8,10,12,15-19,22,25,27,28,30,32-37), while secondary causes included trauma (9 cases, 25%) (4,9,13,20,21,23,24,26,29), strenuous activity (2 cases, 55.6%) (7,12), or anticoagulation/coagulopathy (4 cases, 11.1%) (11,14,20,31). The clinical onset was most often acute (25 cases, 69.4%) (5-7,9-16,18,20-24,26-28,30,31,33), defined as <6 weeks, while a minority presented as acute-on-chronic (8 cases, 19.4%) (8,17,19,25,29,35-37), or chronic (3 cases, 8.3%) presentations (4,32,34). In terms of clinical presentation, almost all cases presented with motor deficit, predominantly paraparesis/paraplegia, as well as bladder and/or sphincter dysfunction. Furthermore, all except for 9 cases presented with severe pain (7,13,22-24,29-31,33). One patient presented with severe respiratory compromise, which resolved postoperatively (30). In our patient’s case, severe back pain was the primary presenting complaint. The 2-year history of insidious back pain likely represented slow growth of the tumour, which may have progressed to severe pain precipitated by the hemorrhage. Jenkins et al. reported similar findings of severe pain possibly incited by intra-tumoural bleed, although the mechanism behind the severity of pain remains unclear (6). Gotecha et al. highlighted that delayed presentation in such tumours (prior to hemorrhage) are common given their indolence (4).

Surgical resection remains the ideal form of management with both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, since an accurate diagnosis of tumour type can only be obtained histologically. In our systematic review, all cases were managed surgically, with majority of cases undergoing urgent surgery (21 cases, 58.3%) (6-11,13,15,17-23,25,27,28,31,35,36), within 48 hours of symptom onset. Delayed interventions ranged from days to months, with one outlier at 6 years (26). The predominant procedure was laminectomy/laminotomy (30 cases, 83.3%) (see Table 1 for a list of relevant cases). Incomplete resection was rare, and was only reported in one case of metastasis (19). Majority of cases demonstrated good outcomes, with all but one case demonstrating partial to complete motor recovery (19). Bladder and sphincter function improved in most of the affected patients, though persistent deficits were common. Pain resolution was reported in approximately 50% of cases where pain was a presenting symptom, often even in the absence of full neurological recovery (4-6,14,17,18,21,26-28,32,36). While recurrence rate was not evaluated due to paucity of data in this review, the existing literature suggests that gross total resection of CE-NETs remains low even with aggressive tumour characteristics at the start, ranging from 0–7% (42-44). Similarly, our patient experienced a near-complete recovery of his symptoms post-resection of tumour and was discharged early on postoperative day 5. Thus, prognosis following surgical resection of IDEM tumours with intra-tumoural hemorrhage remains desirable.


Conclusions

In conclusion, intra-tumoural hemorrhage in IDEM tumours is rare, especially in a CE-NET tumour. While symptoms can be debilitating and range from severe back pain to significant neurologic deficit, early identification from radiological imaging and histology, followed by early resection, can result in good prognosis. Further cohort studies of such cases will be helpful in justifying these conclusions further.


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE and PRISMA reporting checklists. Available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/prf

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Ajmera P, Agarwal AK, Mehta PM, et al. Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors: A single institutional imaging review of cases over two decades. Neuroradiol J 2024;37:84-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Fabbrocini L, Zin F, Keyvani K, et al. Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor: a report of three cases and review of the literature with focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management. Neurosurg Rev 2024;47:166. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Sevin IE, Dağ OD, Kahraman A, et al. A case of rare lumbar intradural tumor: paraganglioma. J Surg Case Rep 2024;2024:rjae054. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Gotecha S, Punia P, Patil A, et al. A Rare Chronic Presentation of Schwannoma with Hemorrhage. Asian J Neurosurg 2019;14:897-900. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Ito K, Ando K, Kobayashi K, et al. Natural reduction in acute intratumoral hemorrhage of spinal schwannoma in the cauda equina. Nagoya J Med Sci 2019;81:701-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Jenkins AL 3rd, Ahuja A, Oliff AH, et al. Spinal Schwannoma presenting due to torsion and hemorrhage: case report and review of literature. Spine J 2015;15:e1-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Jung GS, Lee YM, Kim YZ, et al. Intratumoral Hemorrhage of the Cervical Spinal Schwannoma Presenting: Acute Quadriparesis. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2019;7:160-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Uemura K, Matsumura A, Kobayashi E, et al. CT and MR presentation of acute hemorrhage in a spinal schwannoma. Surg Neurol 1998;50:219-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Cohen ZR, Knoller N, Hadani M, et al. Traumatic intratumoral hemorrhage as the presenting symptom of a spinal neurinoma. Case report. J Neurosurg 2000;93:327-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Ng PY. Schwannoma of the cervical spine presenting with acute haemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 2001;8:277-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Tait MJ, Chelvarajah R, Garvan N, et al. Spontaneous hemorrhage of a spinal ependymoma: a rare cause of acute cauda equina syndrome: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:E502-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Heuer GG, Stiefel MF, Bailey RL, et al. Acute paraparesis from hemorrhagic spinal ependymoma: diagnostic dilemma and surgical management. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:652-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Ozdemir O, Calisaneller T, Coven I, et al. Posttraumatic intratumoural haemorrhage: an unusual presentation of spinal ependymoma. Eur Spine J 2007;16:293-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Ichinose T, Takami T, Yamamoto N, et al. Intratumoral hemorrhage of spinal schwannoma of the cauda equina manifesting as acute paraparesis--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2009;49:255-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Martinez-Perez R, Hernandez-Lain A, Paredes I, et al. Acute neurological deterioration as a result of two synchronous hemorrhagic spinal ependymomas. Surg Neurol Int 2012;3:33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Dobson GM, Polvikoski T, Nissen JJ, et al. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to intradural renal cell carcinoma metastasis haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg 2013;27:249-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Woo PYM, Hung RSL, Wong AKS, et al. Hemorrhagic Paraganglioma of the Cauda Equina: Case Report and Review of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features. J Spine Neurosurg 2014;3:4.
  18. Sahoo RK, Das PB, Sarangi GS, et al. Acute hemorrhage within intradural extramedullary schwannoma in cervical spine presenting with quadriparesis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2015;6:83-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Wu CY, Huang HM, Cho DY. An acute bleeding metastatic spinal tumor from HCC causes an acute onset of cauda equina syndrome. Biomedicine (Taipei) 2015;5:18. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Hdeib A, Goodwin CR, Sciubba D, et al. Hemorrhagic thoracic schwannoma presenting with intradural hematoma and acute paraplegia after spinal manipulation therapy. Int J Spine Surg 2016;10:42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Morimoto D, Isu T, Kim K, et al. Surgical treatment for posttraumatic hemorrhage inside a filum terminale myxopapillary ependymoma: a case report and literature review. Eur Spine J 2016;25:239-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Nagarjun MN, Savardekar AR, Kishore K, et al. Apoplectic presentation of a cauda equina paraganglioma. Surg Neurol Int 2016;7:37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Prasad GL, Kongwad LI, Valiathan MG. Spinal Intradural Schwannoma with Acute Intratumoural Haemorrhage: Case Report and Review. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:PD01-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Panero I, Eiriz C, Lagares A, et al. Intradural-Extramedullary Capillary Hemangioma with Acute Bleeding: Case Report and Literature Review. World Neurosurg 2017;108:988.e7-988.e14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Gandhoke CS, Syal SK, Singh D, et al. Cervical C2 to C4 schwannoma with intratumoral hemorrhage presenting as acute spastic quadriparesis: A rare case report. Surg Neurol Int 2018;9:142. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Kimura R, Miyakoshi N, Suzuki T, et al. Traumatic intratumoral hemorrhage of schwannoma of the cauda equina: A report of two cases. J Orthop Sci 2018;23:1105-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Ghedira K, Matar N, Bouali S, et al. Acute Paraplegia Revealing a Hemorrhagic Cauda Equina Paragangliomas. Asian J Neurosurg 2019;14:245-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Kim JK, Lieberman E, Stein EG, et al. Spontaneous Hemorrhage Followed by Paraparesis in a Patient with a Spinal Meningioma. World Neurosurg 2019;124:366-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Rahyussalim AJ, Wisnubaroto RP, Kurniawati T, et al. Hemorrhagic Spinal Schwannoma in Thoracolumbar Area with Total Paraplegia. Case Rep Med 2019;2019:7190739. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. Singh PR, Nayak N, Gupta SK, et al. Hemorrhage in long segment cervical schwannoma; case report and literature review. Surg Neurol Int 2020;11:476. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  31. Imabeppu S, Shimizu S, Nakai K, et al. A Case Report of Acute Hemorrhage in Spinal Schwannoma Associated with Hemophilia B. Spine Surg Relat Res 2021;5:49-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  32. Mahajan UV, Patel M, Hdeib AM. Cervical schwannoma with acute worsening and intratumoral hemorrhage. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:409. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  33. Mastantuoni C, Pizzuti V, Ricciardi F, et al. Cervical spine arachnoid cyst complicated by spontaneous intracystic hemorrhage: Case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2022;13:427. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  34. Choi C, Lee SJ, Paeng SH, et al. Intradural Extramedullary Ependymoma with Hemorrhage: A Case Report. J Korean Soc Radiol 2023;84:1414-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  35. Salama H, Abu-Hilal LH, Idkedek M, et al. Primary extraskeletal intradural Ewing sarcoma with acute hemorrhage: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2024;18:144. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  36. Shen Z, Chen H, Wang H, et al. Spinal schwannoma presenting with intraspinal hematoma: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2024;18:633. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  37. Zico IA, Anam J, Khalil I. Rare presentation of a spinal schwannoma with fluid-fluid level: A case report on radiological features, histopathological correlation, and surgical management. Radiol Case Rep 2025;20:4331-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  38. Gao H, Wan Y, Ma H, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor of thoracic spine: case report and literature review. Transl Cancer Res 2021;10:1177-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  39. Dobran M, Nasi D, Della Costanza M, et al. Intralesional and subarachnoid bleeding of a spinal schwannoma presenting with acute cauda equina syndrome. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:e229251. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  40. Koeller KK, Rosenblum RS, Morrison AL. Neoplasms of the spinal cord and filum terminale: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000;20:1721-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  41. Zemmoura I, Hamlat A, Morandi X. Intradural extramedullary spinal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: case report and literature review. Eur Spine J 2011;20:S330-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  42. Fiorini F, Lavrador JP, Vergani F, et al. Primary Lumbar Paraganglioma: Clinical, Radiologic, Surgical, and Histopathologic Characteristics from a Case Series of 13 Patients. World Neurosurg 2020;142:e66-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  43. Honeyman SI, Warr W, Curran OE, et al. Paraganglioma of the Lumbar Spine: A case report and literature review. Neurochirurgie 2019;65:387-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  44. Shtaya A, Iorga R, Hettige S, et al. Paraganglioma of the cauda equina: a tertiary centre experience and scoping review of the current literature. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45:103-18. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Yeo MHX, Seah SJS, Lee WQ, Sharma KK, Selvarajan S, Jiang L. Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumour complicated by intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a young male: a case report and systematic review of the literature. J Spine Surg 2026;12(1):14. doi: 10.21037/jss-25-128

Download Citation