Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumour complicated by intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a young male: a case report and systematic review of the literature
Highlight box
Key findings
• Intra-tumoural hemorrhage in intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumours is rare, especially in cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CE-NETs).
• While presentation is often delayed due to their indolent nature, it may become clinically apparent through symptoms of severe, acute lower back pain with neurologic deficits.
• Radiologic features are not well-established and histology is often required to distinguish CE-NETs from other tumour types.
• Surgical resection remains the gold standard management with good outcomes.
What is known and what is new?
• While literature surrounding CE-NET and other IDEM tumours continues to grow, evidence on complications such as intra-tumoural hemorrhage remains rare, with few cases reported in the literature.
• This case report and systematic review provides further evidence on the presentation, investigation and management of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a patient with CE-NET.
What is the implication, and what should change now?
• In a patient suspected to have IDEM and presenting with acute severe lower back pain, intra-tumoural hemorrhage should be considered.
• It is crucial to look out for key features suggestive of intra-tumoural hemorrhage on imaging.
• Early surgical resection is indicated and leads to good prognosis.
Introduction
Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumours (CE-NETs) are rare benign lesions accounting for reportedly 3–4% of intradural spinal tumours (1,2). They were previously termed paragangliomas (PGLs), but most recently they have instead been classified as “paraganglioma-like neuroendocrine neoplasms” in the World Health Organization (WHO) tumour classification due to molecular and histopathological differences compared with paragangliomas originating outside the central nervous system (CNS) (1,2). CE-NETs are derived from specialized neural crest cells in the cauda equina/filum terminale region (3). Unlike extra-CNS PGLs, CE-NETs usually arise sporadically rather than inherited and the rate of recurrence following resection is lower (1). Pre-operatively, the diagnosis of CE-NETs is difficult as it resembles other intradural tumours such as ependymomas and neurinomas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (2).
Intra-tumoural hemorrhage in intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumours is extremely rare, with majority of reported cases in the literature found in spinal schwannomas (4-7). Thus, we share our experience with a rare care of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a CE-NET causing impending conus medullaris syndrome. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of existing case reports to highlight the prevalent tumour types, clinical presentation, imaging findings and postoperative course for IDEM tumours with intra-tumoural hemorrhage. We present this article in accordance with the CARE and PRISMA reporting checklists (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/rc).
Case presentation
A 35-year-old Caucasian male with no previous medical history presented with a 1-day duration of acutely worsening, severe lower back pain with radicular symptoms in the L1 dermatome. The pain was precipitated by weightlifting and on presentation the patient was unable to lie supine due to pain. This was complicated by acute retention of urine, although digital rectal exam revealed an intact anal tone and neurological exam was unremarkable. Prior to this episode, the patient had a 2-year history of insidious lower back pain, of which no appropriate imaging was available and symptoms were managed well conservatively. The patient denied any trauma prior to admission. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.
Radiographs of the lumbar spine showed mildly narrowed intervertebral disc space at L5–S1 but was otherwise normal. MRI of the lumbar spine revealed an IDEM mass lesion adjacent to the conus medullaris at the T12–L1 level. The lesion was hypointense on T2-weighted (T2w) sequence and isointense to mildly hyperintense (minimal enhancement) on T1-weighted (T1w) sequence (see Figure 1). It was compressing on the cauda equina and causing severe spinal canal as well as lateral recess stenosis, although the conus medullaris maintained normal signal intensity. Gradient-echo sequences demonstrated sequelae features of prior intra-tumoural hemorrhage, with the presence of small amount of fluid-fluid level at S1–S2 level representing likely intradural blood products.
The patient underwent a T12/L1 laminectomy and excision of lesion (see Figure 2 for intraoperative imaging). Durotomy was performed at the midline. Intra-operatively, the lesion was mobilised from the dura, and resection of a single efferent and afferent nerve was performed. Grossly, the tumour appeared to be a dark brownish circumscribed nodule, with features of hemorrhage (see Figure 3). Neuromonitoring demonstrated diminished somato-sensory evoked potential (SSEP) from L3–S1 pre-operatively which improved significantly postoperatively. Histopathological examination of the tumour showed sheets of round, mononuclear cells in vascularized stroma with well-differentiated features. Keratin positivity and non-specific staining supported the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumour over paraganglioma (see Figure 4). There was the presence of marked intra-tumoural hemorrhage which interfered with morphological assessment. Biopsy of adjacent bone tissue was negative for malignancy. Postoperatively, the patient’s lower back pain demonstrated considerable improvement and the patient’s pain was well-controlled with oral analgesia by postoperative day 4. Neurological exam was unremarkable, although patient demonstrated mild left scrotal neuropathic pain, possibly secondary to dissection of the nerve root. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5.
Systematic review
A search of three different databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus) up to September 2025 was conducted using terms related to ‘intradural extramedullary tumours’ and ‘hemorrhage’, summarized in our search strategy (Appendix 1). Additional articles were identified via citation searching. Two independent authors (M.H.X.Y. and S.J.S.S) filtered case reports based on title and abstract followed by full-text screen. Inclusion criteria included case reports presenting intra-tumoural hemorrhage in IDEM tumours. Exclusion criteria were: (I) age <18 years; (II) non-English study; (III) hemorrhage not intra-tumoural (e.g., subarachnoid, subdural or intramedullary); (IV) hemorrhage of iatrogenic etiology (e.g., anaesthesia complication). The following data were extracted: age/sex, tumour histology, etiology, onset, clinical presentation, MRI features, timing of surgery (defined as duration from onset of symptoms), surgical details (level and completeness of resection), length of stay, latest follow-up duration and postoperative recovery. As this was a systematic review, combined data was synthesized and reported as mean or percentage using simple arithmetic formula, and qualitatively analysed. Meta-analysis was not conducted. All included studies were case reports on rare conditions, hence risk-of-bias assessment was not required.
Discussion
This case report highlights a rare case of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in a spinal neuroendocrine tumour, or CE-NET tumour, previously classified as PGL tumours. In our systematic review, a total of 36 cases of intra-tumoural hemorrhage in spinal IDEM tumours were identified across 34 publications, of which 23 were published more than 10 years ago (6,8-19), while the rest were published within the last 10 years (4,5,7,20-37). All case report characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 51.5 years old (range, 28–81 years), with a slight male predominance (58.3% male). The study selection process is summarized in the PRISMA Flowchart (Figure 5).
Table 1
| Author, year (ref.) | Age (years)/sex | Tumour histology | Tumour level | Etiology | Onset | Clinical presentation | MRI features | Timing of surgery* | Surgery level; completeness of resection | LOS | Latest FU |
Motor recovery, bladder/sphincter recovery, pain resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uemura et al., 1998 (8) | 58/F | Schwannoma | T12 | Spontaneous | Acute-on-chronic | Paraparesis, radicular pain | T1w iso-to-hyperintense, T2w hyperintense | Urgent | T11–L2 laminectomy; complete | NR | NR | NR |
| Cohen et al., 2000 (9) | 52/M | Schwannoma | T11–L2 | Trauma (fall) | Acute | Paraplegia, BD, SD, back pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense | Urgent | T10–L2 laminectomy; complete | NR | 12 mo | Motor: partial (ambulate with aid) |
| Bladder: partial | ||||||||||||
| Sphincter: complete | ||||||||||||
| Ng et al., 2001 (10) | 43/M | Schwannoma | C6–7 | Spontaneous | Acute | Hemiparesis, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense | Urgent | C5–7 laminectomy; complete | NR | 3 mo | Motor: complete |
| Bladder: complete | ||||||||||||
| Tait et al., 2004 (11) | 57/M | Ependymoma | L1–S2 | Anticoagulation | Acute | Left LL weakness, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain | T1w hypointense, T2w hypointense | Urgent | L2–S1 laminectomy; complete | NR | 12 mo | Motor: complete (ambulate without aid) |
| Bladder: partial | ||||||||||||
| Heuer et al., 2007 | #1: 31/F | Both: ependymoma | #1: L1–S2 | #1: spontaneous | Both: acute | #1: Right LL weakness; BD, back pain | Both: T1w heterogenous, T2w heterogenous | #1: 1 mo delay | #1: L1–3 laminectomy; complete | NR | Both: 4 wks |
Both: motor: complete (ambulate without aid); bladder/sphincter: complete |
| (2 cases) (12) | #2: 31/M | #2: T11–L2 | #2: strenuous activity | #2: Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain | #2: 5 days delay | #2: T11–L2 laminectomy, complete | ||||||
| Ozdemir et al., 2007 (13) | 62/M | Ependymoma | L1 | Trauma (RTA) | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, SD | T1w isointense, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | NR; complete | 3 wks | NR | Motor: complete |
| Sphincter: complete | ||||||||||||
| Ichinose et al., 2009 (14) | 64/M | Schwannoma | T12–L1 | Anticoagulation | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous | 4 wks delay | T11–L2 laminectomy; complete | NR | 8 wks | Motor: partial (ambulate with aid) |
| Bladder/sphincter: complete | ||||||||||||
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Martinez-Perez et al., 2012 (15) | 32/M | Ependymoma | 2 synchronous lesions: T9, L2–3 | Spontaneous | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, back pain | Lesion 1: T1w isointense, T2w hypointense | Urgent | L1–2 and T8–11 laminectomy; complete | 10 days | 2 mo | Motor: complete (ambulate unassisted) |
| Lesion 2: T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense | Bladder: complete | |||||||||||
| Dobson et al., 2013 (16) | 81/F | Metastasis (RCC) | L2 | Spontaneous | Acute | Left LL weakness, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense | 2 wks delay | L2 laminectomy and L1/3 hemilaminectomy; complete | NR | 3 mo | Motor: complete (ambulate independently) |
| Sahoo et al., 2015 (18) | 44/M | Schwannoma | C3–5 | Spontaneous | Acute | Quadriparesis, paraesthesia, radicular pain | T1w heterogenous, T2w iso-to-hyperintense | Urgent | C3–4 laminectomy; complete | NR | NR | Motor: complete |
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Woo et al., 2014 (17) | 60/M | Paraganglioma | T12–L2 | Spontaneous | Acute-on-chronic | Paraplegia, paraesthesia, BD, SD, back pain | T1w heterogenous, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | T12–L2 laminectomy; complete | NR | 6 mo | Motor: complete (ambulate without aid) |
| Bladder: complete | ||||||||||||
| Sphincter: complete | ||||||||||||
| Jenkins et al., 2015 (6) | 62/M | Schwannoma | L2–3 | Spontaneous | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, back pain | T1w heterogenous, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | L2–3 laminectomy; complete | NR | 11 y | Motor: complete (jogging) |
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Wu et al., 2015 (19) | 57/M | Metastasis (HCC) | T12–S1 | Spontaneous | Acute-on-chronic | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain | T1w hypointense, T2w hypointense | Urgent | L1–4 laminectomy; Incomplete | NR | NR | Motor: none |
| BD: none | ||||||||||||
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Nagarjun et al., 2016 (22) | 36/F | Paraganglioma | T12–L2 | Spontaneous | Acute | Paraplegia, paraesthesia, BD | T1w isointense, T2w hyperintense | Urgent | T12–L2 laminectomy | NR | 9 mo | Motor: partial |
| Bladder: partial | ||||||||||||
| Morimoto et al., 2016 (21) | 28/M | Ependymoma | L1–2 | Trauma (fall) | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, back pain | T1w isointense, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | T12–L3 laminectomy; complete | NR | 4 y | Motor: partial (ambulating with aid) |
| Bladder: complete | ||||||||||||
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Hdeib et al., 2016 (20) | 71/M | Schwannoma | T8 | Anticoagulation | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, back pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w hypointense | Urgent | NR; complete | NR | 6 mo | Motor: partial (ambulate with walker) |
| Trauma (spinal manipulation) | ||||||||||||
| Prasad et al., 2016 (23) | 40/M | Schwannoma | C7–T3 | Trauma (fall) | Acute | Paraplegia, paraesthesia | T1w isointense, T2w hyperintense | Urgent | C7–T3 laminectomy; complete | NR | 6 mo | Motor: partial (ambulate with support) |
| Panero et al., 2017 (24) | 58/M | Capillary hemangioma | T10–11 | Trauma (did not specify) | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, SD | T1w iso-to-hyperintense, T2w isointense-to-hyperintense | 15 days delay | T10–11 laminotomy; complete | NR | 18 mo | Motor: partial (ambulate with aid) |
| Kimura et al., 2018 (2 cases) (26) | #1: 64/F | Both: schwannoma | #1: T12–L1 | Both: traumatic (fall) | Both: acute | Both: back pain (no weakness/numbness) | #1: T1w isointense, T2w hypointense | #1: 1 wk delay | #1: T12–L1 laminectomy; complete | NR | #1: 3 y | Both: pain: resolved |
| #2: 61/F | #2: L2–3 | #2: T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous | #2: 6 y delay | #2: L2 laminectomy; complete | #2: 6 y | |||||||
| Gandhoke et al., 2018 (25) | 38/M | Schwannoma | C2–4 | Spontaneous | Acute-on-chronic | Quadriparesis, neck pain | T1w hypointense, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | C2–4 laminectomy; complete | 5 days | NR | Motor: complete |
| Ghedira et al., 2019 (27) | 64/M | Paraganglioma | L2–3 | Spontaneous | Acute | Paraplegia, radicular pain | T1w heterogenous, T2w hypointense | Urgent | L2–3 laminectomy; complete | NR | NR | Motor: complete |
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Rahyussalim et al., 2019 (29) | 38/F | Schwannoma | T10–L2 | Trauma (spinal manipulation) | Acute-on-chronic | Paraplegia, paraesthesia, BD, SD | T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense | 2 mo delay | T10–T12 laminectomy; complete | NR | 6 mo | Motor: partial (ambulate with aid) |
| Bladder: none | ||||||||||||
| Kim et al., 2019 (28) | 68/F | Meningioma | T6–7 | Spontaneous | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD, radicular pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | T6–7 laminectomy; complete | 3 days | 6 mo | Motor: complete |
| BD: complete | ||||||||||||
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Gotecha et al., 2019 (4) | 61/F | Schwannoma | L3–5 | Trauma (fall) | Chronic | Paraesthesia, radicular pain | T1w isointense, T2w hyperintense, fluid-fluid level | NR | L3–5 laminectomy; complete | 2 wks | 2 wks | Pain: resolved |
| Jung et al., 2019 (7) | 37/M | Schwannoma | C2–3 | Strenuous activity | Acute | Quadriparesis, paraesthesia | T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | C2–3 right hemilaminectomy; complete | NR | 3 wks | Motor: complete (ambulate without support) |
| Ito et al., 2019 (5) | 58/F | Schwannoma | L4–S1 | Spontaneous | Acute | Left LL weakness, paraesthesia, radicular pain |
T1w iso-to-hyperintense, T2w heterogenous, fluid-fluid level | 1 mo delay | L5 laminectomy; complete | NR | NR | Motor: complete |
| Pain: resolved | ||||||||||||
| Singh et al., 2020 (30) | 35/F | Schwannoma | C2–T2 | Spontaneous | Acute | Quadriparesis, BD, respiratory distress | T1w hypointense, T2w heterogenous | 1 week delay | C3–T3 laminoplasty; complete | NR | 3 mo | Motor: partial (ambulate with support) |
| Others: respiratory distress resolved | ||||||||||||
| Imabeppu et al., 2021 (31) | 51/M | Schwannoma | L5–S1 | Coagulopathy | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, BD | T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | NR; NR | NR | 4 days | Motor: complete |
| Bladder: complete | ||||||||||||
| Mahajan et al., 2021 (32) | 53/M | Schwannoma | C6–7 | Spontaneous | Chronic | Radicular pain | NR | 9 mo delay | C5–7 laminectomy; complete | NR | 2 y | Pain: resolved |
| Mastantuoni et al., 2022 (33) | 55/F | Arachnoid cyst | C7–T2 | Spontaneous | Acute | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, SD | T1w and T2w iso-to-hyperintense, fluid-fluid level | 3 wks delay | C7–T1 laminectomy; complete | NR | 3 mo | Motor: partial |
| Sphincter: complete | ||||||||||||
| Choi et al., 2023 (34) | 43/F | Ependymoma | T12–L1 | Spontaneous | Chronic | Radicular pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w hyperintense | NR | T12–L1 left hemilaminectomy; complete | NR | NR | NR |
| Salama et al., 2024 (35) | 58/M | Ewing sarcoma | L3–S1 | Spontaneous | Acute-on-chronic | Paraparesis, paraesthesia, back pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous | Urgent | L3–5 laminotomy; complete | NR | NR | Motor: partial |
| Shen et al., 2024 (36) | 53/F | Schwannoma | T12 | Spontaneous | Acute-on-chronic | Paraesthesia, back pain | NR | Urgent | T11–L1 laminectomy; complete | NR | 3 mo | Pain: resolved |
| Zico et al., 2025 (37) | 50/F | Schwannoma | L1–2 | Spontaneous | Acute-on-chronic | Left LL weakness, SD, radicular pain | T1w hyperintense, T2w heterogenous, fluid-fluid levels | NR | L1–2 laminectomy; complete | NR | NR | NR |
*, duration between onset of symptoms and surgery, where urgent surgery occurs within 48 hours. BD, bladder dysfunction; F, female; F/U, follow-up; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LL, lower limb; LOS, length of stay; M, male; mo, months; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NR, not reported; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RTA, road traffic accident; SD, sphincter dysfunction; T1w, T1-weighted; T2w, T2-weighted; UL, upper limb; wks, weeks; y, years.
In the literature, schwannomas accounted for the majority of IDEM tumours with intra-tumoural hemorrhage (20 cases, 55.6%) (4-10,14,18,20,23,25,26,29-32,36,37), followed by ependymomas (7 cases, 19.4%) (11-13,15,21,34) and paragangliomas (3 cases, 8.3%) (17,22,27). One case was reported for each of the following: meningioma, arachnoid cyst, capillary hemangioma and Ewing sarcoma (24,28,33,35). Lastly, 2 cases of metastases were reported (renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma primaries, respectively) (16,19). Lesions were most frequently located in the thoracolumbar region. Notably, the thoracolumbar junction (T11–L2) accounted for nearly one-third of all cases, making it the single most common site of hemorrhagic IDEM tumours (8,9,12,14,17,19,26,34,36). Similarly, in our patient’s case, the tumour originated from T12-L1 region. CE-NET tumours typically arise from cauda equina nerve roots or filum terminale, with some studies reporting higher incidence in the latter (22). Typical histological features of CE-NET tumours consist of cells with round/oval nuclei and rare mitoses, while key immunohistochemical markers include chromogranin A, synaptophysin or cytokeratin positivity (38). Some studies have used the ‘vascular theory’ to explain the pathophysiology of intra-tumoural hemorrhage, which results from ectatic intra-tumoural vessels undergoing spontaneous thrombosis, leading to tumour necrosis and hemorrhage (39).
In terms of radiological assessment, MRI is the gold standard for diagnosis of CE-NET tumours. Koeller et al. reported that PGL tumours are typically well-circumscribed masses isointense relative to the spinal cord on T1w sequence and isointense to hyperintense on T2w sequence, although this is not well-established (40). In the event of hemorrhage, a low-signal-intensity rim is usually seen on T2w sequence (40). For our patient, the tumour was largely hypointense on T2w sequence, which could have been contributed by the intra-tumoural hemorrhage. Interestingly, pre-operatively, the tumour was radiologically diagnosed as an IDEM and we were unable to identify the exact tumour type, which is an issue that remains common in the literature given the uncertainty in its radiologic characteristics (2,41). In our systematic review, the MRI findings remained largely varied, with T1w and T2w sequences for different cases ranging from hypo- to hyperintense, while some had heterogenous enhancement, with no classic finding for each tumour type. Thus, it may be difficult to distinguish between tumour types purely from radiological imaging.
In terms of etiology, majority of the intra-tumoural hemorrhage was spontaneous (21 cases, 58.3%) (5,6,8,10,12,15-19,22,25,27,28,30,32-37), while secondary causes included trauma (9 cases, 25%) (4,9,13,20,21,23,24,26,29), strenuous activity (2 cases, 55.6%) (7,12), or anticoagulation/coagulopathy (4 cases, 11.1%) (11,14,20,31). The clinical onset was most often acute (25 cases, 69.4%) (5-7,9-16,18,20-24,26-28,30,31,33), defined as <6 weeks, while a minority presented as acute-on-chronic (8 cases, 19.4%) (8,17,19,25,29,35-37), or chronic (3 cases, 8.3%) presentations (4,32,34). In terms of clinical presentation, almost all cases presented with motor deficit, predominantly paraparesis/paraplegia, as well as bladder and/or sphincter dysfunction. Furthermore, all except for 9 cases presented with severe pain (7,13,22-24,29-31,33). One patient presented with severe respiratory compromise, which resolved postoperatively (30). In our patient’s case, severe back pain was the primary presenting complaint. The 2-year history of insidious back pain likely represented slow growth of the tumour, which may have progressed to severe pain precipitated by the hemorrhage. Jenkins et al. reported similar findings of severe pain possibly incited by intra-tumoural bleed, although the mechanism behind the severity of pain remains unclear (6). Gotecha et al. highlighted that delayed presentation in such tumours (prior to hemorrhage) are common given their indolence (4).
Surgical resection remains the ideal form of management with both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, since an accurate diagnosis of tumour type can only be obtained histologically. In our systematic review, all cases were managed surgically, with majority of cases undergoing urgent surgery (21 cases, 58.3%) (6-11,13,15,17-23,25,27,28,31,35,36), within 48 hours of symptom onset. Delayed interventions ranged from days to months, with one outlier at 6 years (26). The predominant procedure was laminectomy/laminotomy (30 cases, 83.3%) (see Table 1 for a list of relevant cases). Incomplete resection was rare, and was only reported in one case of metastasis (19). Majority of cases demonstrated good outcomes, with all but one case demonstrating partial to complete motor recovery (19). Bladder and sphincter function improved in most of the affected patients, though persistent deficits were common. Pain resolution was reported in approximately 50% of cases where pain was a presenting symptom, often even in the absence of full neurological recovery (4-6,14,17,18,21,26-28,32,36). While recurrence rate was not evaluated due to paucity of data in this review, the existing literature suggests that gross total resection of CE-NETs remains low even with aggressive tumour characteristics at the start, ranging from 0–7% (42-44). Similarly, our patient experienced a near-complete recovery of his symptoms post-resection of tumour and was discharged early on postoperative day 5. Thus, prognosis following surgical resection of IDEM tumours with intra-tumoural hemorrhage remains desirable.
Conclusions
In conclusion, intra-tumoural hemorrhage in IDEM tumours is rare, especially in a CE-NET tumour. While symptoms can be debilitating and range from severe back pain to significant neurologic deficit, early identification from radiological imaging and histology, followed by early resection, can result in good prognosis. Further cohort studies of such cases will be helpful in justifying these conclusions further.
Acknowledgments
None.
Footnote
Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE and PRISMA reporting checklists. Available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/rc
Peer Review File: Available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/prf
Funding: None.
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-25-128/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editorial office of this journal.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Ajmera P, Agarwal AK, Mehta PM, et al. Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors: A single institutional imaging review of cases over two decades. Neuroradiol J 2024;37:84-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fabbrocini L, Zin F, Keyvani K, et al. Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor: a report of three cases and review of the literature with focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management. Neurosurg Rev 2024;47:166. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sevin IE, Dağ OD, Kahraman A, et al. A case of rare lumbar intradural tumor: paraganglioma. J Surg Case Rep 2024;2024:rjae054. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gotecha S, Punia P, Patil A, et al. A Rare Chronic Presentation of Schwannoma with Hemorrhage. Asian J Neurosurg 2019;14:897-900. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ito K, Ando K, Kobayashi K, et al. Natural reduction in acute intratumoral hemorrhage of spinal schwannoma in the cauda equina. Nagoya J Med Sci 2019;81:701-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jenkins AL 3rd, Ahuja A, Oliff AH, et al. Spinal Schwannoma presenting due to torsion and hemorrhage: case report and review of literature. Spine J 2015;15:e1-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jung GS, Lee YM, Kim YZ, et al. Intratumoral Hemorrhage of the Cervical Spinal Schwannoma Presenting: Acute Quadriparesis. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2019;7:160-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Uemura K, Matsumura A, Kobayashi E, et al. CT and MR presentation of acute hemorrhage in a spinal schwannoma. Surg Neurol 1998;50:219-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cohen ZR, Knoller N, Hadani M, et al. Traumatic intratumoral hemorrhage as the presenting symptom of a spinal neurinoma. Case report. J Neurosurg 2000;93:327-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ng PY. Schwannoma of the cervical spine presenting with acute haemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 2001;8:277-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tait MJ, Chelvarajah R, Garvan N, et al. Spontaneous hemorrhage of a spinal ependymoma: a rare cause of acute cauda equina syndrome: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:E502-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Heuer GG, Stiefel MF, Bailey RL, et al. Acute paraparesis from hemorrhagic spinal ependymoma: diagnostic dilemma and surgical management. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:652-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ozdemir O, Calisaneller T, Coven I, et al. Posttraumatic intratumoural haemorrhage: an unusual presentation of spinal ependymoma. Eur Spine J 2007;16:293-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ichinose T, Takami T, Yamamoto N, et al. Intratumoral hemorrhage of spinal schwannoma of the cauda equina manifesting as acute paraparesis--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2009;49:255-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Martinez-Perez R, Hernandez-Lain A, Paredes I, et al. Acute neurological deterioration as a result of two synchronous hemorrhagic spinal ependymomas. Surg Neurol Int 2012;3:33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dobson GM, Polvikoski T, Nissen JJ, et al. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to intradural renal cell carcinoma metastasis haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg 2013;27:249-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Woo PYM, Hung RSL, Wong AKS, et al. Hemorrhagic Paraganglioma of the Cauda Equina: Case Report and Review of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features. J Spine Neurosurg 2014;3:4.
- Sahoo RK, Das PB, Sarangi GS, et al. Acute hemorrhage within intradural extramedullary schwannoma in cervical spine presenting with quadriparesis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2015;6:83-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu CY, Huang HM, Cho DY. An acute bleeding metastatic spinal tumor from HCC causes an acute onset of cauda equina syndrome. Biomedicine (Taipei) 2015;5:18. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hdeib A, Goodwin CR, Sciubba D, et al. Hemorrhagic thoracic schwannoma presenting with intradural hematoma and acute paraplegia after spinal manipulation therapy. Int J Spine Surg 2016;10:42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Morimoto D, Isu T, Kim K, et al. Surgical treatment for posttraumatic hemorrhage inside a filum terminale myxopapillary ependymoma: a case report and literature review. Eur Spine J 2016;25:239-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nagarjun MN, Savardekar AR, Kishore K, et al. Apoplectic presentation of a cauda equina paraganglioma. Surg Neurol Int 2016;7:37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Prasad GL, Kongwad LI, Valiathan MG. Spinal Intradural Schwannoma with Acute Intratumoural Haemorrhage: Case Report and Review. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:PD01-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Panero I, Eiriz C, Lagares A, et al. Intradural-Extramedullary Capillary Hemangioma with Acute Bleeding: Case Report and Literature Review. World Neurosurg 2017;108:988.e7-988.e14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gandhoke CS, Syal SK, Singh D, et al. Cervical C2 to C4 schwannoma with intratumoral hemorrhage presenting as acute spastic quadriparesis: A rare case report. Surg Neurol Int 2018;9:142. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kimura R, Miyakoshi N, Suzuki T, et al. Traumatic intratumoral hemorrhage of schwannoma of the cauda equina: A report of two cases. J Orthop Sci 2018;23:1105-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ghedira K, Matar N, Bouali S, et al. Acute Paraplegia Revealing a Hemorrhagic Cauda Equina Paragangliomas. Asian J Neurosurg 2019;14:245-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim JK, Lieberman E, Stein EG, et al. Spontaneous Hemorrhage Followed by Paraparesis in a Patient with a Spinal Meningioma. World Neurosurg 2019;124:366-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rahyussalim AJ, Wisnubaroto RP, Kurniawati T, et al. Hemorrhagic Spinal Schwannoma in Thoracolumbar Area with Total Paraplegia. Case Rep Med 2019;2019:7190739. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Singh PR, Nayak N, Gupta SK, et al. Hemorrhage in long segment cervical schwannoma; case report and literature review. Surg Neurol Int 2020;11:476. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Imabeppu S, Shimizu S, Nakai K, et al. A Case Report of Acute Hemorrhage in Spinal Schwannoma Associated with Hemophilia B. Spine Surg Relat Res 2021;5:49-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mahajan UV, Patel M, Hdeib AM. Cervical schwannoma with acute worsening and intratumoral hemorrhage. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:409. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mastantuoni C, Pizzuti V, Ricciardi F, et al. Cervical spine arachnoid cyst complicated by spontaneous intracystic hemorrhage: Case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2022;13:427. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Choi C, Lee SJ, Paeng SH, et al. Intradural Extramedullary Ependymoma with Hemorrhage: A Case Report. J Korean Soc Radiol 2023;84:1414-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Salama H, Abu-Hilal LH, Idkedek M, et al. Primary extraskeletal intradural Ewing sarcoma with acute hemorrhage: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2024;18:144. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shen Z, Chen H, Wang H, et al. Spinal schwannoma presenting with intraspinal hematoma: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2024;18:633. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zico IA, Anam J, Khalil I. Rare presentation of a spinal schwannoma with fluid-fluid level: A case report on radiological features, histopathological correlation, and surgical management. Radiol Case Rep 2025;20:4331-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gao H, Wan Y, Ma H, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor of thoracic spine: case report and literature review. Transl Cancer Res 2021;10:1177-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dobran M, Nasi D, Della Costanza M, et al. Intralesional and subarachnoid bleeding of a spinal schwannoma presenting with acute cauda equina syndrome. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:e229251. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koeller KK, Rosenblum RS, Morrison AL. Neoplasms of the spinal cord and filum terminale: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000;20:1721-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zemmoura I, Hamlat A, Morandi X. Intradural extramedullary spinal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: case report and literature review. Eur Spine J 2011;20:S330-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fiorini F, Lavrador JP, Vergani F, et al. Primary Lumbar Paraganglioma: Clinical, Radiologic, Surgical, and Histopathologic Characteristics from a Case Series of 13 Patients. World Neurosurg 2020;142:e66-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Honeyman SI, Warr W, Curran OE, et al. Paraganglioma of the Lumbar Spine: A case report and literature review. Neurochirurgie 2019;65:387-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Shtaya A, Iorga R, Hettige S, et al. Paraganglioma of the cauda equina: a tertiary centre experience and scoping review of the current literature. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45:103-18. [Crossref] [PubMed]



